Out-of-cycle requests should have a specific justification and should be non-routine in nature. In most cases, it is preferred that departments plan for and use the EPA annual raise process (ARP) to implement salary adjustments for EPA non-faculty employees. The following are justifiable reasons to propose an out-of-cycle salary adjustment:
- correction of an administrative error
- to recognize permanent, newly added duties which are substantive in nature (temporary additional duties are compensated using an administrative salary supplement and not a permanent adjustment to base salary)
- to address documented salary equity issues including those caused by the salary of a newly appointed employee within a work unit
- as a retention offer for an employee who has a documented, confirmable salary offer from an outside institution
In the case of newly added duties, the duties in question should be demonstrated to substantially increase the scope and complexity of the employee's position. Minor changes in duties and responsibilities should be addressed in the ARP process.
Requests to address salary equity issues should briefly demonstrate the specific inequity based on the relative job level, education, credentials, and/or experience of the affected employees. Equity issues may be addressed either out-of-cycle or in the ARP process at the discretion of the Department Head or other administrative approval authority.
Out-of-cycle retention adjustments should have some documentation of the competitive offer from the outside institution. Such requests which require BOT and/or BOG approval must have the offer documented in an e-mail or official letter (preferred) from the offering institution.